Flora Sancta 
Chat and Photos

Flora Sancta - Publication Fall 2005

Lauretta Santarossa Novalis Toronto Canado Feb 18 2005 Lauretta Santarossa We have just settled a deal at Novalis to co-publish Flora Sancta with Canterbury press in the spring. It should be available in June. Check their website for details. It will sell for approx US$40 to 45. Feb 27 2005 John Stokes You'll have to refresh my memory on Flora Sancta. I recall your mention awhile back of a MS nearing publication, but not by name. I've checked the Canterbury websites - U.K., and also U.S - but couldn't find any announcement of publications beyond April. Could you fill me in on the details of Flora Sancta - author, etc.? I seem to recall your mention of a MS maybe by Sr. Lynn Marie, OCD, eremitic kitchen gardener at the Carmelite monastery in Quidenham, England, with whom we used to collaborate, before she went "solitary" off e-mail, and disappeared from view. (See CHAT May 17, 1997.) Mar 3 2005 Lauretta Santarossa Thanks for your reply re Flora Sancta and more. Yes, it is Canterbury UK. Here's the info: Flora Sancta: Plants in Christian History and Tradition Author: Joyce Critchlow It is impossible to exaggerate the part that plants and flowers have played in religious devotion over the centuries. For example, there are over 600 flowers whose common name refers to Mary - the Madonna Lily, Marigolds, Lady's Mantle to name but three. The Christmas Rose (hellebore) and the Lenten Lily (daffodil) signify the close association between plants and the Christian year, while St John's Wort (hypericum) and Michaelmas Daisies reflect the habit of naming plants that came into flower on or around saints' days. This fascinating book - a religious equivalent of Richard Mabey's classic Flora Britannica - is packed with the stories of hundreds of plants and flowers and their Christian associations, interwoven with examples of where flower carvings, emblems and associations can be seen today. Contents Introduction 1 Plants and Flowers with Biblical Associations, 2 Plants of the Nativity and Passion, 3 The Flowers of Mary and Mary Gardens, 4 Saints and their Flowers, 5 Plants in Church Art and Architecture, 6 Plants and the Sacraments, 7 In a Monastery Garden, 8 Plants through the Christian Year, 9 Plants in Popular Devotion. Notes and Acknowledgements, Bibliography, Index of Proper Names, Index of Popular Names. Categories: Advent/Lent Publication Date: June 2005 By Canterbury Press Status:Not Yet Published Price:£25.00 ISBN: 21 85311445 6 Mar 5 2005 John Stokes Many thanks for the info re. "Flora Sancta". This is clearly a major publishing event, supplementing Vincenzina's "Mary's Flowers, Gardens, Legends and" Meditations"; the Mary Gardens chapters in Ann Ball's "Catholic Traditions in the Garden" and Maureen Gilmer's "Rooted in the Spirit - Exploring Inspirational Gardens"; and also Maureen's "God in the Garden" I am especially pleased that it is being published in England, as well as here by you, in that I have always been hoping for major input in the U.K. which would stimulate the planting of Mary Gardens there, bringing together the medieval Flowers of Our Lady tradition with the glorious general tradition of gardening in England. I see from the Canterbury Press website page that Joyce's other books are Church Pulpit Year Books and a Preachers Companion, indicating an overall religious perspective, as do her first 6 chapters of Flora Sacra; whereas the last three chapters appear to deal with the gardening, as well as devotional, dimension. I note with special interest her Chapter 7 "In a Monastery Garden", which brings to mind the chapter of the same name in Rosetta Clarkson's "Green Enchantment re. a 16th century Mary Garden at Melrose Abbey in Scotland. Certain details of Rosetta's account appear to be imaginative, but there seems to be some possible basic corroboration in the mention in Richardson Wright's "Story of Gardening" of an investigation made by the Gereral Chapter at Citeaux, France, of gardens at Melrose Abbey in which the monks were charged with violating their vows of poverty through an over possessiveness of individual gardens. We've never tracked down this information in France, but I did inquire years ago of Rosetta's widower as to whether there might be something in her notes and or archives as to the origin of her information. He replied that he made a search but couldn't find anything. I also wrote to the national monuments people at Melrose, but they replied they had no historical data regarding any gardens, or garden investigations at Melrose Another historical Mary Garden reference is cited by Daniel J. Foley, former Editor of "Horticulture" magazine: "One of the early references to Mary Gardens is to be found in 'An Introduction to the Obedientary and Manor Rolls of Norwich Cathedral Priory' by H. W. Saunders. From this record we learn that the Sacristan had "S. Mary's garden" and the "green garden" and the cellarer rented the "little garden" or "garden within the gates." When Teresa McLean's "Medieval English Gardens", Viking Press, New York, was published in 1981, I wrote her inquiring if she could provide any further information on Norwich and Melrose. She replied that she had researched every document she could find, in libaries and in monastic archives in England, and had found nothing specific about the plantings of the Norwich or Melrose gardens (other than the Norwich accounting records), and judged from her general research that the "S. Mary's Garden" at Norwich would have been a rosary. In recently starting the posting of Developmental Correspondence to the ARCHIVAL section of our website, I noted a letter of October 3, 1980 to Bonnie Roberson in which I described how my then research in the folklore stacks of Harvard's Widener Library corroborated my view that there was something very special about the English Flowers of Our Lady oral names symbolism as compared to that of France, Germany, Italy and Spain, and also of Latin America - just as there was something very special about the Walsingham shrine, and English Marian poetry. In respect to the poetry, I was interested to learn that flower figures were first introduced in English poetry as images of Jesus and Mary, such as a 10th century passage (modernized here) on the Annunciation re. Mary" "The redness of the rose illumines thee and the whiteness of the lily shines on thee, and with all the variety of blooming flowers art thou adorned as the bride of Christ." While not much can be discerned as to distinguishing chacteristics of the flower symbolisms, as such, of the various countries, other than focus - such as in Germany, Mary's motherly love of the Christ Child; in Italy the distribution of graces; and in Spain the variety of fruits of the Holy Spirit - the unusual sequence of historical periods in England give us insight into the English medieval devotion which accompanied the medieval symbols. Thus the "no popery" and "no Mariolitry' of the Reformation - just as printing and wider literacy were being introduced - resulted in the omission of specific Marian flower names in the books on gardening that came to be written; or, per the Oxford English Dictionary the conversion of a few "Our Lady's" to "ladies' (listing some 20 names, such as in ladies mantle and ladies tresses) - although the older oral Lady and Mary names were later written down by botanists, folklorists and lexicographers, as in Britten & Holland's 1886 "Dictionary of English Plant Names (104 Marian namings). Of interest here is the fact that in Southern Germany there has been an unbroken Catholic culture from the medieval period to the present, such that Marzell's "Deutsches Wprterbuch der Pflanzennomen, 1927 - 1979 (1965), lists some 500 Flowers of Our Lady (with 1200 namings) - suggesting that there may have been a similar number of such namings in the popular oral traditions of the pre-Reformation English countrysides. In English literature, following the Reformation, names from classical Greek and Roman myths were introduced by Milton, etc., but as these failed to appeal to the religious and mystical sense of nature of heart and mind, Wordsworth and the other Romantic Poets turned to figurative expression of the religious values they saw as inherent in nature. But, as Coleridge pointed out, the source of the religious meanings and values perceived in nature by the Romantics was realized to be what they themselves were putting into it. Subsequently the void in flower symbolism came in time to be filled by the sentimental "meanings of flowers" invented and widely disseminated by Victorian writers, with the publication of many books setting these forth, continuing to the present day. However, Oxford scholar, Alfred Dowling, in his "Flora of the Sacred Nativity" (1900) presented a detailed analysis, with dates and authors' names, of the 19th century invention of the "meanings of flowers', and of their initial fraudulent representation by some as being of earlier folk origin - contrasting with them the authentic traditional religious names and liturgical uses older names. Dowling focused on only a few flowers of authentic medieval Marian names and symbolism (we counted 58 namings), indicating a proposed book with a full list as subjects, but such a book was not forthcoming. We suggested in 1997 to Keegan Paul that perhaps Dowling' Marian research was in the Oxford library archives somewhere, although an Oxford Internet search by us did not yield such. Perhaps Joyce has uncovered such research. However, Keegan Paul re=published Dowling's "Flora...", after 100 years, in 2002, which we considered a major contribution to the present day restoration of the Flowers of Our Lady tradition in the U.K.. Other contributions to such restoration were Judith Smith's 1931 "The Mary Calendar" (54 namings) - inspiration of the U.S. first public Mary Garden at Woods Hole in 1932; and Grigson's 1958 "The Englishman's Flora" (120 namings). (I say "namings" because, as you know, there are multiple names and symbolims for a number of flowers. The numbers mentioned here are from a quick scan of the 160 flowers, with their multiple namings, listed on the website, per click-indexing: RESEARCH Mary Flowers in...the U.K.,,, List of 160 UK Flowers of Our Lady Joyce's List of over 600 Flowers of Our Lady may indeed include others from her U.K. research, but no doubt includes those from other countries also. The totals from our lists aggregate over 1,000, which we still have to formalize in one list and database. It is significant that in the introduction to his 1989 "Plant Names of Medieval England" (which deals with written monastic records, from which the names from rural popular religious tradition are almost entirely absent), Tony Hunt, of Oxford, states: "The intriguing question of the continuity or discontinuity of medieval and popular names is one that can scarcely be tackled in the present state of plant-name research, but will certainly be an important topic for future researchers working with more extensive materials." I hope that Joyce has made a beginning in this. My article, "The Flowers of the Virgin Mary" was published in the Annunciationtide and Assumptiontide, 1984 issues of "Ave", publication of the Anglican, Society of Mary, of which I am a life member, and Ave "guru", Horace Keast, wrote subsequent articles on the Marian sybolism of the rose and lily. In any case, it is my hope that the time has come historically for a restoration to U.K. religious devotion and gardening culture of the richness of the medieval Marian and other religious symbolism, with accompanying planting of glorious Mary Gardens - liberating flowers from associations with pagan gods and goddesses, and from purely natural, fanciful or scientific considerations. Hopefully there will be re=discovered the religious meanings placed in nature and flowers as showing forth not only God's goodness and beauty, but also his truth - as signatures of divine revelation. While we have continuing website hits from the U.K. (e.g. 3212 in Feb), after 55 years I have specific details of only two present day U.K. Mary Gardens - the one at Lincoln Cathedral (per the photos and lists on the website under RESEARCH > U.K.) and the recent garden at The Church of St Mary de Haura in New Shoreham, Sussex, UK (per the correspondence and photos of the Dec 6, 2003 CHAT entry). I have reviewed all this for you, Lauretta, with Cc's to Canterbury U.K., for any perspective it may provide for the promotion of "Flora Sancta" when published in June. And most of all, I wish to express my profound appreciation to you and Novalis for your publication of Vincenzina"s "Mary's Flowers", happily republished in paperback, and now Joyce's "Flora Sancta". Prayerful best wishes, May 23 2005 John stokes With respect to the forthcoming June publication by Canterbury and Novalis of Joyce Critchlow's "Flora Sancta", I append to this message a copy of a (long forgotten) letter I wrote to Bonnie Roberson, and to Brother Seàn in Ireland, in 1981 (just now transcribed from a photocopy of the longhand original) re. Teresa McClean's then just published "Medieval English Gardens" - which definitively set forth the specifics of the loss of the monastic medieval religious sense of gardening in England with the Reformation destruction of the monasteries. (A loss attemptedly restored by Milton's classical myth references, the Romantic poets, and the Victorian "meanings of flowers") Until reading her book I had assumed, along with Ed McTague - in conducting our initial research for the founding of Mary's Gardens in 1950 - that the some 200 Flowers of Our Lady of English oral religious traditions of the countryside documented in the Oxford English Dictionary (under "Lady's"), Britten and Holland's "Dictionary of English Plant Names" (1886) and Judith Smith's "The Mary Calendar" (1930) (and later corroborated for us by Dowling's 1900 "Flora of the Sacred Nativity" and Grigson's 1958 "An Englishman's Flora") originated from, and were sustained, in their Marian and other religious symbolism, by British monastic gardens - per the Mary Garden described in pre-Reformation Melrose Abbey in the opening chapter of Lauretta Clarkson's "Green Enchantment". (Around 1955 I wrote to Lauretta Clarkson's widower inquiring if there was anything in his late wife's notes and archives - or his recollection - documenting the existence of the Melrose Abbey Mary Garden, and received the reply that he found and knew of nothing. I also wrote to the historical documentation people at Melrose, who replied they knew of no specific records of any garden plants there.) In inquiring of Teresa McLean about this after reading her book in 1981, I received the reply from her (currently archived in Bpston and not at hand) that she had examined every surviving U.K. monastic document she could find, including those of Melrose, and had found no reference to the Flowers of Our Lady or Mary Gardens other than that in "An Introduction to the Obedientary and Manor Rolls of Norwich Cathedral Priory" by H. W. Saunders (accounting records), which had an entry referring to purchases for "S. Mary's garden", the "green garden" and the "little garden" or "garden within the gates" - which S. Mary's Garden she judged to be a rose garden. This is corroborated by Tony Hunt's 1989 "Plant Names of Medieval England" which likewise found no monastic Flowers of Our Lady, and included no research into the oral traditions of the countrysides. I realize all this duplicates much of my message of 5 Mar on the same subject, but I mention it all again as background refresher for the 2/24/81 letter to Bonnie, appended below. I would appreciate your sending a review copy of "Flora Sancta" as soon as available, and will of course write a review indicating all Joyce Critchlow has added to all this - in the context of its importance to the restoration of the Flowers of Our Lady and Mary Garden tradition in the U.K. As ever, PS - This appended letter was written in 1981 - 14 years prior to the establishment of our web site; but also prior to the 1982 restoration of the first U.S. public Woods Hole Mary Garden, the 1983 establishment of the Knock Shrine Mary Garden in Ireland, and the 1989 establishment of the major parish Mary Garden at St. Mary's in Annapolis. As such, it reflects our "voice in the wilderness" view of that time, in which we struggled to get a couple of articles published each year, with only a handful of postal inquiries coming from each, with the starting of Mary Gardens assumedly being mostly in homes - with little feedback to us; so our major focus was on research and on idea development. How different from today, with 1,000+ website visits each day, aggregating from 100 countries. (6,167 file "hits" yesterday, on 950 different files, including 69 from U.K.) and daily e-mail inquiries, constantly evoking broadening of our perspective. We thus are hopeful, with the publication of "Flora Sancta", for a significant starting of Mary Gardens in the U.K., enriched with all the beauty of English gardening. --------------- Appended letter: + Boston, MA February 24, 1981 Dear Bonnie and Brother Seàn, I enclose a copy of a rather lengthy letter I have just written to Miss Teresa McLean, author of "Medieval English Gardens", published within the past few weeks by Viking Press, New York. I was struck that this most excellent book developed a thesis, with extensive documentation, of the deterioration of the religious sense of gardening in England associated with the Anglican schism and the dissolution of monasticism...quite similar to the thesis I developed in my 1953 article, "Man in God's Garden". The inside rear fly-leaf of the book jacket indicates that Teresa McLean is 30 years old, is of Irish-Scottish-English background, was educated in an English convent school, read history at Oxford, wrote a doctoral thesis on the estates of a Priory for Cambridge and worked for a year with Mother Teresa in Calcutta - from all this very evidently a Roman Catholic. As you will see, I made a critical evaluation and response to her book from the viewpoint of our Mary's Gardens work...and made bold to ask her to work with us. She deals almost exclusively with the religious sense of gardening within the monastic setting, and hardly mentions the popular religious traditions of the countrysides at all. In fact, she doesn't include standard dictionaries of plant names in England such as Brittten and Holland and Prior in her bibliography. It has always amazed me that there just don't seem to be any historical records of garden symbolism, prayer, devotion or meditation in English monasteries. Since Teresa McLean seems to be the most knowledgeable person around on U.K. monastic gardens and has done this extensive research at the academic doctoral level, perhaps she can cast some light on this. I had just incorrectly assumed, along with Ed McTague's original conjecture, that the monasteries were the fonts and repositories for the popular religious names and legends of plants. But maybe the rural churches weren't either...although these would be the sources for the sacramental blessing of fields, first fruits, flowers, etc.. Certainly the popular religious traditions of flowers in Latin America don't get all that many supports from monasteries and churches either Also, we have the seeming total lack, as far as I can tell, of Mary Gardens in present day England (other than the "historical collection" at Lincoln Cathedral). As for the city Roman Catholic churches I visited in England, they pretty much didn't have any grounds at all, and those in country towns were flimsy shacks in the poorer sections of town, with hardly any grass around them. This is of course being an infinitesimal sampling, but it made a very strong impression on me. I don't recall seeing any little statues or shrines in yards of homes in England, the way you do in suburban and rural United states. Come to think of it, I saw one from the window of a train my first trip to England in 1973...I believe an Our Lady of Lourdes statue with a little grotto and trellis around it, in a back yard (as you can sometimes see from the perspective of looking down from elevated train tracks). It is significant that Teresa McLean evidently does not come out of the "gardening establishment", but rather out of an academic research context. I can see that it would take a lot of courage - that of a "Knight of Our Lady', or of a "Valiant Woman" (as Ed McTague characterized Mrs. Lillie) - to promote Mary Gardens in England...other than as an "historical collection" as at Lincoln Cathedral. However, Lincoln Cathedral and Teresa McLean's book represent a sort of "softening' of this scene...so I've sent out the call to them in the hope that someone will be moved to undertake this work with us there. It's significant that Mrs. Lillie's Garden of Our Lady at St. Joseph's Church in Woods Hole appears to have been pretty much likewise to be ignored by both the church and the garden club community of Woods Hole (the original 50 or so flowers of Our Lady having been replaced by a few conventional varieties)...but just keeps going on through the trust fund she set up to finance it's maintenance. And the people who visit it are mostly scientists and students from the Marine Biological Laboratory and Oceanographic Institute in Woods Hole...as Mrs. Lillie intended. Last summer when I went to photograph the Garden one morning I found a student sleeping in it with her sleeping bag and knapsack...a little Mary Garden hospitality! So if parishes, convents and monasteries aren't particularly interested in the Flowers of Our Lady and Mary Gardens in our own experience today...why should we assume they were in medieval England? Love to Ernie. Sincerely, in Our Lady, May 23 2005 Lauretta Santarossa Rest assured that I will certainly send you a review copy of Flora Sancta. It is due this summer ready for sale in September, I think. But you'll be top of the list for reviewers. I've been asked to talk about Mary Garden's at our Canadian National Exhibition (The "Ex" as we call it) in Augut. Will let you know how it goes. Every good thing, May 24 2005 Becky Good Morning, I am writing on behalf of my manager, who is wanting a list of Mary Gardens she is able to visit in the UK. I have had a look through the website, but couldnt find any specific listings. Can you help at all? Kind Regards, May 24 2005 John to Becky Hi Becky, Thank you for your message of 24 May. In response to your inquiry as to a list of Mary Gardens in the UK, I am (astoundingly) only able to refer you positively to two: The first is in the Cloister Garden of Lincoln Cathedral, founded by Jon Codrington of the Lincoln Herb Society some time prior to 1950, when we learned of it through our Irish associate ( since l973), Brother Seàn MacNamara of the Christian Brothers. This is not a full "Mary Garden" in the sense of being devotionally tended around a focal sculpture of the Blessed Virgin, but more of a historical collection of Flowers of Our Lady. Codrington's general description, with an annotated list of its 34 Flowers of Our Lady, is reproduced on our Mary's Garden Internet website at www.gardens.org - click-indexed from our Home Page via: RESEARCH Mary Flowers in....the U.K. Flowers of Our Lady planting in the Cloister Garden of Lincoln Cathedral A click-link at the end of this description accesses a reproduction of "The Flower Arranger" illustrated leaflet describing the garden. The two photos of the Lincoln Cathedral cloister planting were taken by a family member visiting it some five years ago. The second U.K. Mary Garden of which we know was planted two years ago at The Church of St Mary de Haura, New Shoreham, Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex, Sussex, UK - The Revd Victor Standing, Rector - per our Website illustrated entry at CHAT Dec 6, 2003 - with description from their pamphlet. We are awaiting an update and further photos I said "astoundingly" above, as Frances Crane Lillie, foundress of the first public U.S. Mary Garden in 1932 at St. Joseph's Church in Woods Hole, Massachusetts - inspiration for our "Mary's Gardens" project, undertaken in 1950 - stated in a descriptive leaflet for the garden that the list of plants "was made from English sources, because of course Catholic England inspired the interest". In our one visit with her in Woods Hole in 1954 (she was invalided, and unable for long periods to communicate or receive visits) she told us that her inspiration was "from English monastery gardens", and that it could be one of several, but that with her failing memory she could no longer recall from just which one(s). However, her brother-in-law, Wilfred Wheeler - builder and nurseryman, who had planted and cared for the garden (and had built the St. Joseph's Angelus Tower, given by her to the church, beside which it was planted) had given us during a l952 visit a copy of Judith Smith's "The Mary Calendar" (St Dominic's Press, Ditchling, 1931), given to him by Mrs. Lillie, listing English wildflowers of Our Lady - which on inspection was found to be the source of the 61 flowers listed in her 1932 "Our Lady in Her Garden" leaflet. So, perhaps there is a Mary Garden at Ditchling? Our first clue that there were evidently only a very few Mary Gardens in the U.K. was the forwarding to us for reply by the Anglican "Church Times" of London around 1953 of a letter-to-the-editor inquiry they had received inquiring about Mary Gardens. The inquiry may have originated from a reprint in the May 1953 English "Novena" magazine of an article in a Feb 1952 U.S. magazine...or from the Mar 1933 "Catholic Digest" if this magazine is distributed in the U.K.. Following this there was an article, "Our Lady's Flowers" in the "Church Times" of Apr 15, 1955. Perhaps the Editor would know of the location of one or more Mary Gardens. Other U.K. magazines with articles on Mary Gardens were a Jan 54 issue of "Universe", the May 1, 1981 issue of "Universe" and the Winter, 1984 "The Flower Arranger". The "Flower Arranger article followed our exchange of a number of letters with them re their Lincoln pamphlet, and come think of it, I seem to recall mention that several of their people were going to start gardens, but I never heard if they did or received any photos. You might check with them. In the spring of 1987 we were contacted by Sr. Lynn Marie, OCD, kitchen gardener at the Carmelite monastery in Quidenham, by e-mail, informing us that she had undertaken to be an UK source of information and seeds for the Flowers of Our Lady and Mary Gardens. An article, "Flowers for the Queen of the May", accessed via a link at the very end of RESEARCH Flowers of Our Lady and Mary Gardens in the U.K. describing her initiative, was published in the London, Catholic Herald of May 16, 1997. We exchanged a number of e-mail messages with her over the summer, in which she mentioned such things as that the Bishop was interested in starting a Mary Garden at Walsingham. Then, abruptly, Sr. Lynn Marie informed us in the fall that she was undertaking an stricter, eremetic, rule in a hermitage on the monastery grounds; was discontinuing all communications outside the monastery; and was terminating her e-mail address. Subsequently we attempted to communicate with her, and then with others at the monastery by postal mail, but our letters were refused and returned. A correspondent checked for me a couple of years ago, and found she was still at the monastery. Maybe there are ways of reaching her? This correspondence is posted on the website at CHAT May 17, 1997 I had also corresponded with Deborah Jones, Editor of the "Catholic Herald", who said she was starting a small Mary Garden of her own; but e-mail messages to her started to be undelivered several years ago. You might try contacting her through the Herald, to see if she still has a Mary Garden, or knows of others who do. Since the putting up of our website in 1905, there have been numerous file "hits" from the U.K. - 10,041 Jan-Apr this year. Surely there "must" be numerous Mary Gardens "out there" in the U.K. somewhere - perhaps, home Mary Garden "early adopters", following the U.S. experience of 50 years of "hidden" growth, with public parish and Shrine Mary Gardens only notably being established in the last 5 years or so - which the publication of Vincenzina Krymow's prize winning "Mary's Flowers, Gardens, Legends and Meditations" may have had a lot to do. If the last is true, hopefully the coming publication of Joyce Critchlow's "Flora Sancta" by Canterbury Press this summer or fall will have a similar effect. With respect to "Flora Sancta". I have started an anticipatory thread at CHAT May 24, 2005 (lots of duplications in these various references, each of which is somewhat "stand-alone" on its own - but also man more details, such as for example the publication of little Flowers of Our Lady holy cards, illustrated on the website, of we have four, by Medeci Press) Thanks for prompting me to chronicle all this (or some of it). In sum, whenever we have put this much energy into something, there have always been Providential results, so I have no doubt that there will one day be magnificent Mary Gardens in the U.K. with all the beauty and horticultural excellence of the English gardening tradition. Yours truly, May 23 2005, Lauretta to John Rest assured that I will certainly send you a review copy of Flora Sancta. It is due this summer ready for sale in September, I think. But you'll be top of the list for reviewers. I've been asked to talk about Mary Garden's at our Canadian National Exhibiotion (The "Ex" as we call it) in Augsut. I am going to emphasize the Mary Garden part of my usual talk for this one. Will let you know how it goes. Every good thing, June 8 2005, John to Lauretta Thanks for your message of 23 May regarding the scheduling of the publication of "Flora Sancta" for September, In double-checking the Canterbury Press website just now, I see, however, that publication has been put back again, to November. If editing is still under way, it might be well to include some mention of the various Marian doctrines symbolized by the Flowers of Our Lady: in respect to the publication last month by the ecumenical Anglican - Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) of their agreed statement, "Mary: Hope and Grace in Christ", five years in preparation, which has been "submitted...to the Holy See and to the Anglican Communion for comment, further clarification if necessary, and conjoint acceptance as congruent with the faith of Anglicans and Roman Catholics". A copy of this long document is available on the Vatican Internet website at: http://212.77.1.245/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/angl-comm-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20050516_mary-grace-hope-christ_en.html Representative criticisms and differences from the Anglican "Church Times" and Protestant sources (as kindly brought to my attention by Julie Ardery of the Human Flower Project website at www.humanflowerproject.com/) include: http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/80256FA1003E05C1/httpPublicPages/4BC1B2EC0DDF71868025700600488B21?opendocument http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2005/120/21.0.html http://www.crosswalk.com/news/weblogs/mohler/?adate=3/18/2005 So many of the Flowers of Our Lady symbolically reflect the doctrines of Mary's Immaculate Conception and Heavenly Assumption - dealt with in the ecumenical agreement - as well as reflecting other traditional doctrines such as those of Mary's Co-Redemption, Queenship of Heaven and Earth, and Mediation of all grace - which, while not defined as Roman Catholic dogma nor formally accepted by Anglicans, are so widely expressed in the liturgy; by saints and theologians; and popularly - that some mention of them would be appropriate in any books of Marian relevance published at this time. The important perspective here is that the Flowers of Our Lady - the specific flower symbols - have come to us historically as religious folklore, by way of the popular oral religious traditions of the countrysides of Europe and Latin America, as eventually written down by botanists, folklorists and lexicographers; and as such do not purport to represent theological affirmations. Although a few - the rose and lily, etc. - were symbolically present in religious paintings and prints of the Madonna and Child in Gardens Enclosed, Rose Gardens, the Heavenly Paradise, and the few in Mary Gardens (from which we took the name for our work); they were not prominent or much recorded in monastic tradition - per the scholarly research, in England, of Teresa McLean, author of "Medieval English Gardens" (1980), or of Anthony Hunt, author of "Plant Names of Medieval England" (1989). As the Flowers of Our Lady existed as a matter of historical fact in popular folklore tradition, they don't have to be doctrinally "justified"; and their contribution to present day devotion, prayer and mysticism is simply a matter for those who discover them and are inspired by them - or, as late Ed McTague (R.I.P), co-founder of Mary's Gardens in 1951 used to say, is a matter for "those who have a sense for these things". Interestingly, when we went public with Mary's Gardens back in 1951 as a project of lay Roman Catholic spare time independent initiative in the restoration of popular folklore religious tradition, we were immediately "investigated" by a priest of our Philadelphia Archdiocesan Chancery office, in their concern lest we were involved in some sort of pious fraud. But when we showed them the folklore documentation in the Oxford English Dictionary (under "Lady's") and in old plant dictionaries, and showed them that our introductory $1.00 mail order "Our Lady's Garden" literature, photo and seed packet kits we then advertised cost us twice as much to produce, they told us that as far as the Church was concerned we could proceed with "official toleration". (In this, our work was for a long time not picked up by Catholic schools, as it did not conform with the detailed specs for teaching Marian doctrine. But, this has now changed: 2,989 May hits of Slide Lectures 1 nd 3, and 2,085 of Background Reference/Index for Teachers) Actually, the pious fraud, if any, was in the in the mostly invented "meanings of flowers" introduced by Victorian authors (and about which so many books have been written) - as documented by Oxford scholar Alfred Dowling in his "Flora of the Sacred Nativity" (1900, reprinted 2003). The proposed ecumenical Roman and Anglican acceptance of the Assumption, brings me back in memory, also, to the time in the fall of 1950 when, just as Ed McTague and I were considering starting Mary's Gardens, Pope Pius XII proclaimed the Roman dogmatic definition of the doctrine of the Assumption - saying, when asked about the possible similar definition of Mary's Mediation, that this was "not yet sufficiently ripe in the mind of the Church". From over 50 years of pondering Marian doctrine, as mirrored by her flowers, it has become clear to me that all of Mary's divine privileges (per "He that is might has done great things unto me" of the Magnificat) derive from her union with God ("the Lord is with you") into which she was brought - and to which she assented ih her immaculate purity, her utter humility and her total acceptance of God's word - at the Annunciation. United with God, in the divine conceiving in her, by the overshadowing and indwelling Holy Spirit; and in her consequent co-parenting with the Father - of God the Son Incarnate, Mary, through the fullness of this union, was totally united with God in all respects. This fullness of her divine union is thus the enabling basis also of her Co-Redemption, Universal Mediation, Queenship, conquest of Satan, etc. with God; - and even, in "the retroactivity of eternity", of her union with Ged the Father as "Our Lady of Creation" - per "I was with him forming all things, Playing before him at all times" from Proverbs 8:30 ff., applied to her by the Church Fathers and the liturgy, and as, for example, shown forth in the renowned tapestry, recently restored, of "Our Lady of Creation" at the Notre Dame de France Church, off Leicester Square in London. The Anglo/Roman agreement document only goes so far - with supporting scriptural and references - as to derive or "permit" only the doctrines of Mary's Immaculate Conception and Assumption, from the scriptural revelation of her Divine Maternity. The derivation of her Co-Redemption, Queenship and Universal Mediation, etc. do not have such scriptural support - even though they have doctrinal support from the theological concepts of the purpose of Creation and of the fullness of her Divine/human union to this end. What is fundamental here is the traditional wider appreciation by the medieval Christian faithful, the "People of God", generally, that the fullness of the divine/human relationship in Mary is an unique beginning fulfillment, in her, (after the failure of this in our First Parents, likewise immaculately conceived), of God's desire in creating the world to show forth and share the divine goodness, beauty, truth and action with us humans, created to this end "in the divine image and likeness" - and this to the fullest. The culminating fulfillment, from this beginning, of God's Creational desire of for the ever fuller overall divine sharing with us humans is now being accomplished by way of the heavenly positioning of Mary such that in the ever furthering of her fullness of her own divine/hunan sharing, she - in response to our beseeching that she pray for us - receives all our prayers to God in intercessory embellishment and augmentation, making them all thereby also her own for the fullest divine acceptance by Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and the consequent bestowal by them of the prayed for divine grace, light, wisdom, power and providence; ever proportioned through her universal mediation to the receptivity of those praying and prayed for, for fullest divine/human sharing by all, in the grace-guided building and coming of the Earthly Peaceable Kingdom to be eternally transfigured in the eternal New Heaven and New Earth. This is the "top down" view, as opposed to the "bottom up" view of a more subservient religion and a limited, "scripture-bound" perception of our human potential for divine sharing - even though we are created to this end "in the divine image and likeness". (In this we are instructed by G.K.Chesterton's hyperbolic observation that "Protestantism is a prejudice of people who have learned to read" - the Bible; but we are to recall that the Flowers of Our Lady symbolism comes from before the introduction of printing and general literacy.) It's amazing to me how many argue about their perception of Mary's usurping Christ's mediation, when in actuality she, though her immmaculateness, etc., is making possible the fulfillment of God's Creational desire for the fullness of divine/human sharing. I also reflected and dialoged a lot on these matters in my five years service in the 1960's as recruited Catholic Executive Director of the interfaith Wellsprings Ecumenical Center in Philadelphia - founded by Episcopal Bishop Robert deWitt and Presbyterian Minister Raines - in which I participated in or observed numerous Catholic/Protestant, (and also, Jewish/Christian, Christian/Islamic, Black/White, Men/women, Youth/Adult, etc.) dialogs, we organized for church and synagog groups throughout the area. I expect that the Anglican Society of Mary, in its furthering of the restoration of pre-Reformation English Marian devotion and prayer, has made a contribution to the ecumenical Roman/Anglican affirmation of the doctrines of Mary's Immaculate Conception and Assumption - which, of course, weren't yet dogmatically defined by the Roman Church at the time of the Reformation. We, at Mary's Gardens, first became aware of the Society of Mary through a 1981 inquiry received by Bonnie Roberson (then handling our research, promotion and inquiries from her Idaho address) from a member of the Society's U.S. Minnesota chapter - which she, Bonnie, referred to me for reply. Through this I entered in time into correspondence with the Society's London headquarters, and, at their request wrote the article, "Flowers of the Virgin Mary" - published in two parts in the Annunciationtide and Assumptiontide, 1984 issues of their quarterly magazine "Ave" (now click-index posted on the website via ...articles, 1984). This was followed by "Ave" articles by their staff author, Horace Keast, on the Marian symbolism of the rose, the lily and the flowers of the field as found in his research into English pre-reformation Marian tradition. In the course of this I subscribed to a lifetime membership to the Society, and continue regularly to receive copies of "Ave". Then on accessing the Internet in 1994 I participated in the Anglican "listserve" e-mail correspondence community, entering into discussions of Marian doctrine - a participation ending in 1986 when our Mary's Gardens website, founded in 1995, came to require all my available time. Of particular importance to Mary's Gardens of the current proposed Anglo/Roman reconciliation with respect to Marian doctrine is that Frances Crane Lillie said and wrote that her inspiration for her founding of the the first U.S. public Mary Garden, at St. Joseph's Church in Woods Hole in 1932 was "from English Monastery Gardens" and from the list of some 50 English wildflowers of Our Lady in Judith Smith's "The Mary Calendar" (1931). Of special significance in this was Judith's mirroring, in her narratives of the flower symbolism, of the unique maidenly esthetic beauty of English Marian poetry. This special quality of English pre-formation devotion to Our Lady was evidenced by extensive research I did also into the comparative flower symbolism of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, etc. in the folklore stacks of Harvard's Widener Library, as described in my letter of October 3,1980 - posted :n: ARCHIVAL Developmental Correspondence Letters, Bonnie Roberson, Hagermann, ID 1980 My interest in Anglican/Roman reconciliation comes especially from my own English ancestors' participation in the Reformation - one of whom was a member of the Jury (and son-in-law of the judge) in the trial which condemned Thomas More; with the consequent giving to them, my ancestors, by Henry VIII of a farmhouse, Friars' Grange, "sequestered" (as my uncle, family historian, put it) from a confiscated monastery. My ancestors of the next generation emigrated to America as Quakers. This has been rather long, Lauretta, but I wanted to stress the importance of the new doctrinal proclamation for Mary's Gardens, "Flora Sancta", and myself personally - in keeping with Ed McTague's counsel that we should ever endeavor to be a "pure source" re. Mary's Gardens. And, I should repeat, all this is not a matter of some sort of personal Marian devotional enthusiasm, but of a lifetime conclusion as to God's will re. the building and coming of the Earthly Peaceable Kingdom, for which we pray each day in the "Our Father" (per the Website article, "Peace on Earth - Fatima Revisited". Prayerful best wishes, PS -I've just checked the May website stats and see a current status of 2505 file hits for the month from the UK, including hits for the U.K. related files of: 141 - RESEARCH: Flowers of Our Lady and Mary Gardens in the U.K. 91 - CHAT - Dec 6, 2003 - New Shoreham, Sussex, Mary Garden 72 - CHAT - May 24, 2005 - Flora Sancta - Publication Summer 2005 48 - CHAT - May 17, 1997 - Sr. Lynn Marie, OCD Brief Start Note that Flora Sancta... was only up for the last week in May (For May, 321 people accessed your and my ARCHIVAL, 1997 ff developmental correspondence - the highest in this category)